7.12.2018

True cause of sleep apnea streptococcus bacteria in the eyes?

What if the true cause of sleep apnea was a chronic eye infection?  I think it is and I'm doing experiments to test that possibility.  For a great portion of my life I have had the white of my eyes have blood vesseles inflamed making my eyes especially my right eye look bloodshot and this runs in my family.  I just recently started realizing that this, like every other disease on this planet, is caused by bacteria.  In this case particularly, likely staphylococcus bacteria.  What I didn't think was that the eye/eye socket could be a resevior of bacteria that doesn't just cause local effects, but even neurological problems from panic attacks to sleep apnea.  Because I designed a salve using 2 tbsp coconut oil, 1 tsp beeswax, and 50 drops thyme essential oil to kill the bacteria and not only has my eye inflammation subsided, but so has my sleep apnea which causes my insomnia also abated.  Thyme oil was added to kill staph and strep.  I put it on my eyelids, under my eyes, and on the sides around my eyes at night and it penetrates in enough to kill the bacteria.

What if our eyes, from the bags to the dark circles were not only a superficial problem but also could effect our system wide health and put us at risk of an early death?  What if dark circles weren't a symptom of lack of sleep but actually the cause of it?

Eye bags may actually be a healthier sign than dark circles because the bags may indicate inflammation which means the immune system is fighting the bacteria whereas the dark circles may mean a lack of proper immunity.  However I notice bags/swelling when my sodium intake is high and potassium intake is low so it could also just indicate high blood pressure along with vessel permeability from inflamation.  But if the skin surrounding your eyes is not perfect in any case it probably means that your eye sockets are a breeding ground for heart attack/sleep apnea/panic attack inducing bacterial biofilm.  To cure, dilute some thyme essential oil with a carrier oil and apply around your eyes every night and your conditions should improve.


alternatives to sleep apnea treatments needed, I think we have the answer
https://apnews.com/5b1533185f4d4372bc56452c161e6aa7

7.06.2018

Storing energy in the Aether: the Aetheric Battery

This invention is kind of a joke in some ways.  The technology is real and powerful, but manipulating the aether has so much bigger applications than storing energy.  It is like saying a "compressed air battery".  Yes compressed air can be a store of energy (and a really good one) but the last thing when we think of the usefulness of compressed air is energy storage.  Yet this energy storage is what powers all the air tools we use whether or not we recognize it as such.

And in this vein I unveil to you the aether battery.  First of all you may not even believe in the aether.  That "dark matter" that Tesla believed in and many more before him and all but "debunked" by modern physics right?  Actually no, Science has clung to a rebranded form of Aether theory called "dark matter" and "dark energy".  They call anyone a quack for believing in Aether while they peddle their own version of it daily.

Well no one knew what the aether was really made of until my post about "how to travel faster than the speed of light by rarefying space".  What the aether really is, is condensed light.  Light is a particle and a wave much like a wave of water.  A water wave is made out of the particles called water molecules.  In the same way light that we see is a wave of photons moving through the aether.  the aether is the "pond" of photons that light moves across much like a water wave moving across a pond of water.

What makes me think there is a "pond" of relatively stationary photons throughout the universe?  For starters, even if we were swimming in a pond of photons, if the photons aren't moving we cannot detect them.  The only reason we can see light is because it's kinetic energy excites our photo-detectors.  Well one way to detect it is to make a near perfect vacuum and see if light shot through it looses energy at all even without interacting with matter.  Or since photons have some sort of magnetic tendencies, to see if a near perfect vacuum can interact with magnetic fields.  Regardless on how someone would want to verify this theory, why do I strongly suspect this pond of photons exists?  As I said in my linked post, because light tends to clump together.  A ultra cold gas of rubidium atoms can be used to cause light to clump together.  How does this work?  First thing you have to understand is that light is basically negatively charged.  Light doesn't have electrons itself, but light is what makes up electrons.  So light itself tends to be negative.  Now what we can learn from electrolysis is that when you remove some of the charge from a material, it tends to repel each-other less and stick together.  For example when you strip an H+ ion of it's charge it tends to stick to another H atom forming H2 gas.  This is actually how I realized how the rubidium experiment worked.  The rubidium ions are in the alkali metal column of the periodic table.  These metals are strongly positively charged and attract negative charged atoms like oxygen and fluorine.  They also will tend to strip the "negativeness" from light and allow it to clump together.  Now this can even be done with freshly made light.  Just imagine "old" light that has been traveling through inter-cosmic clouds for millenia loosing it's "negativeness" all along the way.  This is happening everywhere in space and eventually these photons will start sticking together and forming a pool of photons.  This pool is the aether.  And just like a pool of water can limit the speed of things traveling through it, the aether limits the speed of things moving through it as well.  But just like you can surpass the speed of water waves and sound waves (however when you do the craft becomes less stable) you can also travel through space faster than the speed of light, albiet you can travel faster through space if you disrupt the aether just like a car "drafting" another car can go faster because the car ahead disrupts the air in front of the other car.

This disruption or "evacuating" of the aether from an area (or compressing it) is the basis of the Aether battery or Aether energy storage.  Now one way to change the density of the aether (is it incompressible by the way?) is to use Magnetic Unity (MU) technology.  Not just moving magnetic fields, but orbiting magnetic fields can effect photons.  This orbiting magnetic field technology can "evaporate" or "condense" the aether.  Another way is simply using the nuclear chemistry described in the light sticking together experiment.  Rubidium atoms and those near it on the periodic table can condense light and concentrate the aether and take energy from it, and Iodine atoms (or mabye even hot clouds of fluorine?) and those near it on the periodic table can cause light to repel eachother even more strongly, increase it's energy (mabye even increase it's max speed), and reduce the aethers density.

So the same way you create a differential, you can also capitalize on the differential.  Powering orbiting magnetic fields can be a way one can harvest energy from an aether imbalance.

So utilizing these principles the aether battery can be made.  Magnetic unity and nuclear chemistry can be used to affect the density of space, and this differential in density can be used to create energy.  Perhaps these natural cosmic scale variations of aether density in space is what the Sun eats for fuel and may describe periods of solar minima and maxima and longer cycle solar phenomenon as well?  Just like our bodies produce more heat after we eat, perhaps the sun does the same.

7.05.2018

Heat assisted solvent to gas dispersion (STG) open source patent

This invention is for the basic technology of Heat Assisted Solvent to Gas Dispersion.  Also known as STG technology - Solvent to Gas.



The basics of the invention is the solvent (which can be solid, liquid, gas or any other state of matter) that may or may not contain molecules/atoms/compounds etc. of interest is volatilized into a gaseous suspension or solution (preferably with droplet size smaller than 5 um exiting the device) using both heat transfer and dispersion methods.  Dispersion is defined as forcibly introducing gaseous material in any way, which may or may not include cavitations, into the solvent of interest.  This does not include cavitations naturally occurring from the boiling process, but these cavitations can be a part of what this technology does.  But the scope of this invention is to only cover inventions that forcibly disperse a gas into/through/over/around the solvent and this may or may not include natural force-less boiling gas dispersion. This technology can be used for any purpose including but not limited to: Research, propellant, fuel, medical purposes, non-medical personal use, disposal, energy, delivery or transport, or any other industry or field for any purpose.  This can be used on the massive industrial or governmental scale or for personal portable devices, home or car devices, micro scale, nano scale, pico and femto scale, and anything in between or combination.  Anything that can benefit from efficiently vaporizing a solvent.  Solvent can be anything with solvent properties including water, aqueous solutions, polar solvents, non-polar solvents, dry ice, liquid nitrogen, combination, or anything else that can be used as a solvent in any capacity.  The process of dispersing the solvent into the gaseous phase can be utilized for co-dispersing of other items of interest.  This can be anything, but for example it could work similarly to steam distillation of essential oils from plant matter.  In that process steam is used to extract essential oils from plant matter which are re-condensed into liquid oils.  This process can include any thing like that where the solvent being dispersed (which can be partial and slow or complete and fast or any combination) is utilized to accomplish other purpose(s).  This current invention is not for collecting or harvesting this material such as steam distillation and collection of essential oils, but solely for dispersing this material into the gaseous phase.  Material can be collected after an STG process, but this recovery is not part of this technology.

I want to make it abundantly clear that this is not intended for and will not work with "vape juice" or "e-liquid" or any other "e-cigarette" nicotine substance.  Liquids containing a high percentage of glycerine simply will not be dispersed by any reasonable STG process.

"Vape Mod" or "Vape device" which is the electrical device that can power a resistance coil; may be used to create heat for this invention via the 510 adapter.  This shows that these electrical devices have more uses than just for e-cigarettes and therefore are not under the purview of the FDA.

The temperature used for heat transfer can be ambient temperature or elevated temperature above ambient which is preferred.  Heat just has to transfer to the solvent in any way to increase it's vapor pressure and make it tend towards evaporation.  Next, gaseous matter needs to be introduced and/or mixed into the solvent to further disperse the solvent into the gaseous phase.  The way this works is forcing gas or cavitations into/through/around/over the solvent and possibly breaking up through the surface of the solvent which would counter the surface tension of the liquid (which tries to keep the solvent together) by adding shear forces (if the solvent is liquid) to help break off clumps of liquid into the gaseous phase.  Preferably next (but not required) would be heat transfer elements (optionally extra shear/dispersion methods as well) that increase the heating surface area to help finish evaporating/dispersing the liquid blobs into the gaseous phase and/or keeping the vapor from condensing on the apparatus.  Next preferably would be introducing ambient air or another gas to lower the vapor saturation of the gas (diluting it) and possibly cooling it as well.  This can even be done using a vortex of gas introduction if desired.  If utilizing the solvent to propel other desired molecules into the gas phase, then the solvent can be recaptured if desired and reused.  In the end there will be a gas that includes material of interest suspended or in solution with the gas.

Gas for dispersion and/or extra gas insertion can be introduced in any way but can be from pumps, gas injection, breathing/inhaling, gas buoyancy, or anything else.  If a dispersion element(s) are used to disperse the gas in the solvent, anything can be used.  Capilary tubes can be used if desired and if the ID of the tubes are correct for the height of the liqhid above them, they may not leak.  For example if 1.1mm ID or smaller capilary tubes are used and the liquid level above them isess than around 29/64", then water in this cashe shouldn't leak out the capilary tube(s).  Or a typical fritted gas dispersion tube can be used as an example and to prevsnt this from leaking the inlet could just be above the liquid level.  This air inlet can also be used to load solvent if desired, moniter the liquid level automatically or visually, used to automatically add solvent or other material, etc.

The solvent, and/or material of interest, can be introduced into the chamber/device by siphoning, pumping, squirting, injection, aliquoting, etc.  All or some of the solvent can be dispersed at a time.

Going back to the "steam distillation" essential oil example; if for example distilled water was heated and gas was dispersed through it, and either essential oil was in/on the water or in herbal material above the water and the essential oil was desired to be volatilized, then the steam/water particles could help quickly shuttle the essential oil into the vapor phase, and if desired, the water could be condensed and returned to the device while much of the essential oil remained in the vapor phase.  This example may or may not be practical but is just an example of the sort of thing this technology can accomplish.


7.02.2018

Ossicones are Infrasound Antennae

Giraffe and Okapi are the only currently living species with ossicones on their heads.  Scientists have been baffled by them and think they are vestigal traits from when giraffes had horns like deer.  Well as those who actually respect nature, we know that nature doesn't make mistakes.  We know that nature "matures" rather than evolves and can mix and match traits using "genetic vector reservoir" adaptation to the current climate and environment.  So why do giraffes have these antennae or tuning fork looking things on their head?  Because they need it to hear/sense infrasound.  Giraffes communicate long distances using low frequency long wavelength infrasound.  These sounds travel long distances but are too long wavelength to be heard with typical eardrums.    The ossicones really are like tuning forks and vibrate when these long wavelength sounds hit them which helps the animal communicate and sense these unique communications.  Also perhaps it is like a form of encrypted communication that cannot be heard by predators but can be herd by other giraffes.  Genius.

More on infrasound and how it can be felt in various places in the body (that match in size to some fraction of the sounx wavelength)
https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Infrasound

Okapi, the only other species with ossicones, also communjcates with infrasound.  The probability that this theory is correct just skyrocketed.
https://africageographic.com/blog/the-outstanding-okapi/

6.30.2018

Mycobacterium tuberculosis eats dopamine

Latent tuberculosis causes Conservatism and latent Toxoplasmosis causes Liberalism.  Tuberculosis destroys the bodies dopamine.  Toxoplasmosis creates excess dopamine.  Conservatives work hard for little pleasure.  Liberals hardly work and pursue pleasure.

Both are diseases.  Both can be cured.

Toxoplasmosis has been studied in this regard in the past but not so much with tuberculosis.  People don't yet realize that tuberculosis is also a mind controlling organism that nearly half of the worlds population has their entire life.  Tuberculosis lives in the neck causing occasional stiff neck.  It lives in the cervical lymph nodes causing few symptoms other than a lack of dopamine.  This can manifest in many ways just search for "symptoms of low dopamine".  The reason it lives here is just like fish waiting for food to come down river, tuberculosis camps out in the neck lymph dining on dopamine coming from the brain draining cerebrospinal fluid.  Drugs that kill tuberculosis are often "fake" dopamine.  The bacteria eats the fake dopamine and are poisoned.  One of these compounds is aporphine found in blue lotus.  For those of us who have latent tb in our neck, this medicine makes us feel stronger.

An essential oil blend of the following applied directly to the neck can also be a great treatment.  Neck may feel stiff after you apply this, that is how you know it is killing tb:

juniper berry
clove
nutmeg
thyme
garlic
cinnamon
frankensence
rosemary

For more oils and oils that will work for toxoplasmosis (which also lives in the neck) see this link:

http://www.naturehackerproducts.com/2018/05/a-neck-salve-designed-improve-neck.html?m=1

6.28.2018

The Genetic Vector Reservoir (GVR or "Giver") Theory of Speciation:Natural Selection is incomplete

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain speciation via natural selection by mutation.  Darwin's theory was over-reaching and he tried to from mutation to natural selection to speciation to evolution.  The Achilles heel of this theory is mutation.  Christian scholars have long found this flaw and I believe convincingly proved that random mutations cannot produce consistent progress let alone speciation.  It just doesn't work.

However christians are also at a loss for how the very finite number of species noah saved on the ark were able to apparently speciate into all the species we have today.

So it seems both sides of this debate have their glaring problems and also merit.  Here I will propose not a compromise between the two but a more full understanding of the possible truth to the tools of biological organisms have to adapt to earth cycles.

I have long thought that extinction was not the end.  I had a feeling that in the next ice age woolly mammoths would return and not just by humans cloning them.  As an aspiring scientist to make much progress at all you literally have to come to grips with the fact that Nature has done everything we have invented, and done it better than we could ever dream.  Nuclear Fusion power plants?  Sun did it before the earth existed.  Solar power?  Plants are much more efficient than our panels ever will be.  So to be a good scientist you have to believe that nature has done literally any invention you could hope to dream of, and has done it better than you will ever contemplate.

So nature has done genetic engineering and cloning.

How could nature recreate the woolly mammoth?  Well if we can find DNA in old remains and inject them in a similar species, why do you think nature hasn't?

Nature Has.

And it will do it again.

I also think there is a reason we bury our dead and try to preserve them from total decay.  Now it should seem obvious that we have a natural instinct to preserve our precious DNA.

Nature keeps an inventory of all the DNA that has ever existed on our planet.  Let that sink in for a second.  Where is this resevior kept?  Where is the global seed vault located?  Mostly the polar regions I would conjecture.  How does nature do the work of implanting this DNA into genomes of living creatures?  Vectors.  If you know much about biology when I say that you should think of mosquitos, virus', bacteria, etc.  Also I would venture to guess in food we eat, water we drink, perhaps also the air we breathe.  These vectors are constantly transfecting us with ancient DNA.

These vectors also incorporate the DNA. This could be why we seem to have so much "junk" DNA, perhaps it is a remanent of this likely not perfectly efficient process.  Likely sometimes DNA from the vector itself, or mutilated sequences are also incorporated but I would venture to guess there are protections against this from happening normally.

The world is a reservoir of recycled DNA.  Evolution happens; most likely speciation is rare but I think thereis an  incredibly large probability that traits can be lost in say hot geological times and those traits regained in ice ages for example.  This world is supporting life perhaps more than we yet realize.

6.27.2018

Nobel Metal Air Battery for use in Vape mods and any other use

Vaporizers have a problem.  They explode.  It happens to a dozen people a year and so far one person has died.  It is a significant liability for Vape Mod (e cigarette vaporizer device) makers and is a major deterrent to releasing a device. There have been regulator calls for alternative power sources beyond lithium ion which is not prone to fires and explosions like crap lithium technology is.  This is particularly dangerous because these devices are used near peoples faces.  "Rechargeable Lithium" (I use quotes because the very notion is an oxymoron) batteries are the hallmark of a society which has lost touch with anything resembling good responsible engineering and instead hell bent on making a quick buck at any cost.

Well I have done much much research in the past on batteries (so much that I could have a PhD in Electrochemistry) that I think I am in a unique place to solve this dilemma.  And it just so happens that the tech I have pioneered, the nobel metal battery, would find a holy grail type of application into the vaporizer industry.

What is a noble metal battery? In its simplest and near optimum form it is a battery that uses a copper anode and a porous sintered (or just packed powder) ruthenium (actually leaning toward rhenium now since ruthenium price exploded.  Perhaps rhenium iridium and/or ruthenium alloy) cathode in a 37-40% (or higher if possible) HCL electrolyte.  Ruthenium I have found to be the best trade off between voltage and cost/ease of use.  Rhenium and especially Iridium are better cathodes, but the high cost and extreme melting points of these metals and inability to cost effectively electroplate them on other metals make them impractical.  Copper is the best anode from my testing but alloys with germanium or some sort of germanium surface treatment of the copper or germanium in the electrolyte may be able to achieve higher voltages (for more info see electrochemical series).  The cathode need not be porous or sintered if an oxidant is added to the electrolyte, but optimally this would be an air battery so a porous cathode would be ideal.  Also for recharging; air and/or nitrous oxide is much more ideal than hydrogen peroxide because when the gas pressure is reduced the oxidant nature of the system goes away and stops self discharge and also improves rechargability.  Hydrogen or another gas can replace the air in the porous cathode if desired and further improve rechargability and/or storage.  As far as the electrolyte; HCL at the highest percentage possible gives the highest voltage and also highest amperage of discharge.  The only thing I think could do better is possibly HF, but that is one of the few deadly chemicals out there so I hope it is not used.  Plus I'm not really sure it would even be better, maybe as a small percentage of the electrolyte it could help.

Copper ruthenium air battery should give roughly 1.4 volts and 1 amp per square inch of cathode surface area (depending on porosity and thickness of the separator between anode and cathode and air flow rate through the porus cathode).  So lets say as a 18650 replacement we can hope to achieve 4 Amp draw and 1.5 volts.  I think that would easily work in vaporizers.  A single one could probably work but 2 in series would work for sure.

Why nobel metal?  Why not NiMH for example?  NiMH would be an improvement over lithium but it still suffers the inherent bad design in any so-called rechargeable batteries today.  This design flaw is using low conductivity non-metal compounds for anodes and/or cathodes.  They require this in order to be rechargeable simply for the fact they don't understand that at it's core - true recharging is electroplating and to have a truly rechargable battery it must operate on the principles of electroplating.  All current battery technology has been designed to try to skirt around this law of nature.  And they have not been successful, in the same way Big Pharma drugs have been designed to skirt around the fact that all medicine humans need has already been patented by plant life since the beginning of time.

What I am saying here is my nobel metal battery will not only last a lifetime of recharging with proper care, and also last a really long time before needing to electrically recharge (most recharging done by blowing into it), but is fully rebuildable and modular.  This would be the holy grail for modders and it is also the holy grail for the air battery technology.

Why is vape the perfect use for air battery technology?  Air batteries are plagued by one problem, they need air pressure.  Car's have a good application at using this battery technology because they are moving through the air and can use this to funnel some of the air into the battery.  But here it is even easier, you could have people "blow out" into the battery (which they already need to blow out in order to inhale) before inhaling the vape.  This will instantly "charge" the battery and bring up the battery voltage for use.

How can this be done?  Well my best idea so far is a battery compartment that separates the top of the battery from the bottom with some sort of gasket or o-ring.  This could be part of the device or even part of the battery itself.  This way for example the top of the battery can be pressurized by the user by blowing or also by pumping a lever (could be combined with puming e-juice into the tank/rda) and the bottom can be at ambient atmospheric pressure.  To get air flow there needs to be a pressure differential so this is what the o-ring(s) accomplishes.  So in this example the sintered porous cathode (or a porous alumina disk that is on top of pressed ruthenium powder) would be exposed at the top of the battery and the battery would be vented through the bottom of the battery, preferably though a porous alumina disk.  HCL vapors would be expelled to some degree so this should be neutralized by having it travel through for example a hygroscopic ceramic filter which will scavenge the HCL.  This could be a part of the device or even battery itself.  Vape juice can even be used to wet this filter to improve its ability to scavenge the corrosive fumes. Nice.

6.24.2018

Straight to Solvent (STS) Alkaloid extraction method

A straight alkaloid extraction to solvent that includes a few simple steps like acidifying, basifying and salting.  No special glassware or tools are needed but a glass mortar and pestle, coffee grinder, glass bottles, dropper bottles, glass funnels, beakers, crystallization dish, and vacuum evaporation setup is desired.  It is similar to drytek and Straight to Base (STB) and also Acid Base (A/B) extraction.  The benefits are likely higher alkaloid yield over AB and STB and also easier and less finicky than drytek.  Most similar to Q21Q21's Vinegar/Lime A/B Extraction Tek.

1. add herb to glass mortar and pestle.
2. grind herb to powder with or without liquid (skip if used coffee grinder).
3. add just enough water or vinegar to moisten the powder to a paste that flows well and allows easy mixing in the mortar and pestle. mix & grind (m&g).
4. add some acetic acid (excess is fine) if not using vinegar. m&g for a few mins only.
5. add some sodium carbonate or CaOH (or any other base, depends on your solvent choice and alkaloids) to desired pH.  Your pH should be 1-2 points higher than the pka of your alkaloid.  Overshooting the amount is fine. mind the temperature, try not to let it get too hot. m&g for a few mins only.
6. add decent amount of non iodized NaCl or other salts (including more sodium carbonate, magnesium sulfate, etc.) to increase ionic strength and dry the mix. m&g.  make sure pH is still at desired level.
7. add non polar solvent (nps) like limonene.  Use a small amount and m&g well.  Decant and collect the solvent for later.  Add more nps, m&g, collect solvent and keep repeating this until the solvent is clear.  Discard plant material and keep all collected solvent.
8. Add some magnesium sulfate (epsom salt) to the solvent, shake, then our solvent off into another container.  This will remove any water/cloudiness from the solvent.  Different solvents may require different drying agents like calcium sulfate.
8. Evaporate solvent.
if you are using limonene I suggest getting a ground glass flask with a vacuum elbow ground glass attachment and using a vacuum pump to help it evaporate faster.  Boiling chips can be added to limonene and will be helpful to prevent splashing and product loss. You can even collect the evaporated limonene if you want, look up vacuum distillation setups.  Make a 47-60c waterbath and put the flask with limonene in it.  This is right around the boiling point (but preferably you will not see much boiling) of limonene at the pressure of a decent vacuum pump.  Direct a fan blowing on the vacuum pump to help keep it cool.
9. If you want alkaloids to remain in solvent, redissolve with a little solvent and pour into dropper bottle.  If not, keep the crude obtained after evaporating.
10. If you want crystals you have 2 options.  If your alkaloids' freebase is a powder and your alkaloid is not super soluble in your solvent, then you can recrystallize in the concentrated solvent.  Otherwise just evaporate the solvent completely or go to step 11.  Preferably put your solvent in a recrystallization dish and put it covered in the freezer for a day or three.  Carefully and quickly (so it stays very cold) decant and discard the solvent keeping the crystals.  If it warms up at all when you are decanting then your crystals will redissolve and we don't want that.  Now evaporate the dish containing the crystals to dryness.  If you want to further purify the crystals, you can add a little bit of new solvent to redissolve the crystals (you can warm it up a bit so it redissolves easier) and recrystallize again.  If you just want to wash the crystals then make sure the crystals and dish they are in is frozen temp and a little extra new solvent is frozen temp too.  Pour the new solvent on the crystals and decant keeping the crystals and discarding the solvent. Then if you want water soluble crystals dissolve crystals in a little water and fumaric acid (see below for more info on acids) and evaporate the water using gentle heat.  Perhaps acidified ethanol would also work and evaporate easier.  These crystals can also dissolve in glycerine.
11.  If your alkaloid is an oil and you want crystals you will need to salt it out.  To do this take your concentrated alkaloid in solvent mix and add it to a bottle.  Now add some water with fumaric acid (or any other acid like tartaric, citric, vinegar/acetic, lactic, even hcl, depending on your alkaloids and how solid you want the final product).  For oily alkaloids use fumaric acid because it is non-hydroscopic so your powder/crystals will be drier.  Now mix this (can be just shaken in the bottle) and your alkaloids should come out of the solvent and into the acidic water.  This water can be evaporated and the crystals obtained.  These crystals will be soluble in water and/or glycerine.

notes:
-you can make sodium carbonate by baking baking soda in the oven.
-mortar and pestle is optional but I think it is the best mixing device for this process.
-caoh used for high pka alkaloids (10 or higher), sodium or potassium carbonate for low ones (around 9 or lower).  Sodium or potassium hydroxide can be used instead but mix it in some water before adding.
-vinegar added first to help break the alkaloids free from oxalic acid in the plant.
-want to add base before salting so all of the acetate salt can be converted to freebase.

6.11.2018

Proof of Thought (PoT): The Holy Grail of Cryptocurrency has arrived

 Also called Proof of Human work (PoHW)

This idea was sparked by the great and succinct riddle that monsterer2 proposed on this BitcoinTalk thread:

"A truly decentralised consensus mechanism is one where humans perform the PoW. The trouble is, finding a problem that only a human can solve that is also easily verifiable by a machine is unsolved.

The person who solves this problem will be very rich indeed. "

Ask and you shall receive.

While I do not expect to get rich ( I have solved many of the worlds biggest problems; but if it doesn't make someone else rich then no one cares) from this idea. Actually I think the opposite, people will hate this idea because they would actually have to work for their money instead of having a computer doing it for them.

I have termed this idea Proof of Human Work (PoHW). I do not claim that no computers or AI will be able to mine this. However I do claim that humans will have a fair shake at least until an algorithm can be developed to solve it (which likely will take a good number of years at the very least since these problems have been known and researchers trying to solve them for decades at least). I think the biggest risk to this proposal is the training of AI to use skills humans have developed to solve these problems.

It would probably find form in "puzzle video games". They can likely be done with paper or pencil but doing it on a computer in a program or app would be the best way to go for mining purposes.

The idea is simply this: Use NP-complete problems as a proof of work. NP complete problems are Non-deterministic polynomial time problems. An NP Hard problem means in essence that they cannot be sped up with computers. The larger the problem, the worse computers (algorithms) are at solving them. Np-complete are a subset of NP-hard problems. What NP-complete means is that a computer can easily verify a proposed solution is correct, but cannot "know how to" solve the problem. This even works if you believe P=NP (which I do), as you can create a new coin using a new NP-complete problem that has not been cracked (or change the algorithm of your coin but I always advise against this where possible).  P=NP hypothesis means that every problem that can be easily verified can eventually be solved quickly too.

Now the problems shouldn't be just NP-complete, all hashing functions are designed to also be NP-complete.  But the problems should also benefit from heuristics.  This means that you can find ways to improve your ability to solve the problem.  You likely won't be able to find any heuristics for SHA256 for example but you can find heuristics for the traveling salesman problem or minesweeper for example.

This is exactly what we want; a problem whose proposed solution can be quickly verified by computer and yet the computer would be "bad" at finding solutions itself. Perfect.

Some example problems to solve could be the traveling salesman problem and/or minesweeper, and/or any other NP-complete problem or combinations of problems. Any implementation and/or mining methods or programs or suggestions can be used. This idea can be used by itself or in conjunction with computer mineable problems like using this idea in conjunction with other PoW algorithms.

For example you could have a 100x100 minesweeper or any size or size dictated by automated difficulty adjustment and the first one to solve it win's the block in mining. A program could disseminate this to people around the world to work on it and could pool the individuals and split the reward or give the individual who wins it first the whole block reward. Also some programs can have collaboration where everyone can work on the same minesweeper problem together. There are many challenges minesweeper would pose (such as needing a trusted 3rd party to create the minefield or obfuscating their ability to see it) in this context which we won't go into, it is just an example of how this human mining could be set up.

Minesweeper is np-complete

Traveling salesman problem

Drawbacks: People have to do work. Slavery could result from this. People may need more food because thinking takes energy.

Benefits: Mining centralization will be a smaller problem. Anyone with a brain and a communication method can contribute and earn money. Even animals like bees may be able to be used to solve these (search: bees traveling salesman). No specialized hardware or even computer is needed. Energy problem will be nonexistent. Just like we don't tell people not to exercise, this will be exercising peoples brains. The whole global network would use negligible extra energy, and even if the people ate more, exercising the brain will make them healthier. It may help reduce the risk of dementia and other degenerative brain diseases. This is our liberation from the coming "tyranny of the algorithm".

Here is another whitepaper that uses the term proof of human work however it uses CAPTCHA's and not NP-complete problems.  I think our idea is better and is more veritably NP Hard.
https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/145.pdf

This topic, using conway's game of life as a PoW problem, fits into this definition I have given of Proof of Thought:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2977765.0

Can also be called Proof of Neural Work or Proof of biological work or proof of thought.

6.09.2018

The Mastercoin System: Blockchain based personal IOU accounting

The Mastercoin System: Blockchain based personal IOU accounting.
What do banks do that we can't? Create debt. Oh wait, we can create debt too, it is called an IOU. So why don't we do this? Why do we abdicate our own ability to create debt and instead have banks create debt for us?
Because everyone trusts that the bank will repay debt that they issue. But I don't think this is so true anymore. I would venture to guess more people dread going to the bank than to the dentist or doctor. Banks are showing thier cards in thier fees, how petty and backstabbing they really are while claiming it is free checking or some other BS. This is a symptom of an industry in upheaval, benks can't reliably make money on interest anymore and have to resort to nickel and diming. Or more like jackson and hamiltoning us to death.
There is no reason for friends to use bank issued debt to pay eachother back. Doing this is just bending over for the banks. Friends don't let friends use banks.
So how can we use IOU's in an efficient way? Pen and paper anyone? Apps now exist that allow you to keep track of who owes you what. But what I have seen does not let debt automatically be cancelled when someone owes you and you owe them back. So we need to design a system that can cancel debt automatically. Also a ledger to keep it all in that can be accessed anywhere by anyone on any device and trusted by all parties.
Blockchain anyone?
Here's how it could work.
Everyone gets a private key(s) and each private key is free to create as much debt as they want on the platform, or there could be a debt limit per key. In order to create debt you would need two signatures. A signature from the private key who is creating the debt, and a signature from the private key who is accepting the debt. So say for example Bob owes Sally a jug of maple syrup (maple syrup explained later). Bob creates a debt of 1 in a transaction, signs it, and includes sally's public key. Sally sees this and signs the transaction as well. Now the blockchain miners record this as a completed transaction. The “1” will be stored in the blockchain as bieng owed from Bob to Sally. Call it a “bob to sally coin”. No one else can extinguish this debt with sally except sally (exceptions later). To do this she has to create a “sally to bob coin”. Once bob has paid sally a jug of maple syrup then sally creates a “sally to bob coin” (signed by both parties) which extinguishes the debt. Or Sally could owe bob a jug back for something and she sends Bob a “sally to bob coin”, and this act also extinguishes the current debt. By doing this maple syrup or anything else doesn't have to physically change hands. Just friends paying back a favor.
Miners keep track of all of these transactions and append them to thier ledger for mining the next block. Miners can use any proving system the software allows like Proof of work or proof of stake or other method or combination to win the block reward and append thier transaction ledger onto the blockchain. The block reward can be anything but preferably denominated in jugs of maple syrup (more info on this later), say 10 jugs of maple syrup worth of coins. Now these miners coins are signed by the blockchain itself and the miner. They are a sort of master key that can extinguish any debt on the blockchain. Lets call them Mastercoin's. The way this should be viewed as slight and predictable inflation; debt will be worth a little less because miners can extinguish some of it. This is the cost of using the platform, you are paying this to the miners to keep the ledger for you. The problem here is that no one would want a miner or apparent miner from owing them anything because they would always just be able to extinguish the debt; the friends of miners would bear all of the inflation on the network. Ouch. So how do we get around this and make the miners coins (mastercoins) not wreak havoc to thier close friends? The solution is to allow the mastercoins will continue to work after given, but at a reduced rate. So say a miner has a mastercoin. For example this mastercoin would be able to extinguish say 4.4% of 1 jug (.044 jugs) of maple syrup debt. Now this coin when given will forgive the miner of 4.4% of 1 jug of debt to a friend. Then this friend will be able to use this mastercoin to forgive 4.3% of a jug's worth of debt to thier friend, and on and on. When all is said and done 99% of 1 jug's worth of debt (.99 jugs) would be extinguished from the network from that one mastercoin. So people will actually want to be friends with miners. Why? Because bieng friends with a miner will allow you to pay off your debts for free (well a small fee) for just forgiving the debts that miners have with you.
Why jugs of maple syrup? Because we need a consistent value of each unit of debt. If you say you owe me a car so you owe me “1” then when that person gets a mastercoin they can extinguish that car debt much too easily. We need everyone to value a unit of debt the same, so we need to find an item that is valued similarly no matter what country and currency you use is. Enter maple syrup.
Why maple syrup?
    1. Liter Glass Jug of 100% pure Grade A maple syrup
      1. It is easy to produce without technology, and technology doesn't give such a great advantage. There aren't a lot of disruptive technologies in maple syrup production that would change it's relative value against other things. There are no GMO maple trees. No pesticides or herbicides or fertilizers will give you a significant competitive advantage. It is non-destructively harvested, the trees stay alive. It is possible to be used and traded interchangably with syrups produced in other biomes like Agave Nectar, sugarcane syrup, honey, etc.
      2. It can be verified by simple technology. The simplest technology is taste or density. Or light: http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/science-and-innovation/research-centres-and-collections/quebec/saint-jean-sur-richelieu-research-and-development-centre/safeguarding-maple-syrup-quality/?id=1519066161077
      3. It is required biological energy. Hunting produces protien and fat, edible weeds can produce vitamins and minerals, but carbohydrate is precious and difficult to come by in nature.
      4. It is hypoallergenic. Many people are allergic to it's competitor, honey.
      5. It is non-perishable. You can HODL it and not worry about it going bad or changing in any way. Not damaged by air (unlike oil), not irreversibly damaged by moisture (just reboil it).
      6. Common value: the cost of a jug of maple syrup is around one hours worth of labor which is a convienient amount and similar to the price of a meal or other things that people would typically owe someone.
      7. Self contained and easy to transport or ship. If the value was less than it may not be worth the shipping cost of an individual item.


In conclusion we have developed a blockchain based system of tracking IOU's with your freinds.


Downsides:
  • Mastercoins would have to carry a dataset. For example master coins will have the be signed by each recieving and giving party, and the value will lessen depending on how many times they have been signed. This could potentially, but not likely, cause fungibility issues.
  • IOU's will have to also have a dataset, ie: this coin is only valid between sally and bob.
Benefits:
  • Anyone can use the system without having to buy coins or mine them. You simply just start using the system. The mining just causes a small fee for using the platform, and not a monetary fee, just making you forgive a little bit of peoples debt. Not a problem.

6.07.2018

Proof of Play (PoP): A proof of stake consensus utilizing video game PoW

Gamers play video games.  If the gamer is good they can achieve a lot of rewards in the game.  From player level, stat points, skill points, gear, experience points, and in-game currency; these achievements prove that the player has done work.  The whole point of video game design is so that bots and cheating cannot win you rewards in game.  Other products/services/companies also have this like uber, doordash, amazon, etc.  Miles driven in uber, number of years working at walmart, etc.  These sorts of achievements can also be used in this idea.

Why not utilize this proof in a blockchain?  How would that even be done?

Proof of stake.  That is how it would be done.  The stake could be the player level, in game currency, stat points, skill points, miles driven in uber, packages delivered for amazon, etc. or anything else or a combination.

Proof of stake is typically an unfair system because anyone with lots of money can easily gain a high stake.  But coupling the proof of work by achieving things in a game or other system to set the stake the player has, will allow proof of stake to be fair while not wasting CPU cycles to arbitrarily prove work.

In conclusion games (and any other system) are designed to prove that work was done by a user.  Why not utilize this to prove work on a blockchain?  This is done by coupling player work to a stake in mining a coin, token or anything else on a blockchain or similar network or technology.  The currency will be "backed" by how much people trust the game/dev's.  Amazon could have FlexCoin where Flex drivers get a mining stake based on how many packages they have delivered.  Walmart could have PensionCoin where employees get a mining stake based on how many years they have worked at the company.  Companies can even premine the coins or take a fee for every transaction.  Could this in fact be a better version of an ICO?

The games or systems themselves can even run on this blockchain partially or fully if desired.  For example an MMO could be devoid of a central server and instead the stakeholder players could record server data like character locations and items etc. on their computer and their ledger would be included in the blockchain if they won the next block based on their proof of stake.

6.04.2018

Claim Consensus: Another example application of Bid consensus

Here is another example of how bid consensus (claim consensus) can be used.

A minimum chain length is required to claim a coin and this claiming can be permanent if desired.  So lets say for example this length requirement is 1000.  So you can start mining a coin and when you hit a blockchain of 1000 blocks (or more) for it then you post this chain to the consensus layer.  There may or may not be a "bidding time" and/or "verifying time" set starting when you post your 1000+ blockchain that gives others an opportunity to verify your chain and for others to post a longer chain if they want to bid against you for ownership.  Now there can be multiple consensus layers and they can have different requirements for claiming coins, but as long as they don't change the algorithm and rules then your blockchain for coin claiming will still be valid, but may or may not be sufficient depending on how long of a blockchain they require.  And this blockchain you posted is public so someone else can mine on top of your chain to claim your coin on another consensus layer so some miners may want to keep mining their coins past the requirement that some consensus layers require so they can be assured to claim the coins on new consensus layers.  This would be similar to hard forks in some ways and different in other ways.  It would be the similar as the same people can own the same coins on multiple blockchains, but different in that there is no "fork" persay and you trading coins could show up on both blockchains simultaneously if desired or not (by the consensus layer using replay protection techniques).  But the cool thing is clone coins could be invented that copy your transactions from another consensus layer but the new consensus layer uses a new algorithm.  This would mean if one consensus layer becomes 51% attacked the other ones with different algorithms would be safe.  If one consensus layer get's 51% attacked it is no problem because no coins will be lost (accept on that consensus layer) because everyone's ownership is already backed up by the fact that they have their own coins blockchain that they can use to claim their coins on another consensus layer.  You would finally be truly in control of your own destiny.  It would be much easier in this situation to swap consensus layers than it is to currently shift momentum from a coin to its hard fork.

The consensus layer can be anything, centralized or decentralized.  It can be a program or database or blockchain or anything or combination.  This layer would most likely be a blockchain as well.  The interesting thing here is it doesn't need to offer any rewards, either coins nor fees in order to get miners.  Why?  Simply because people already have an incentive to mine on it.  Why?  Because they own coins and those coins need a good trustworthy consensus layer to trade them.  It is the same incentive people have for creating crypto wallets.  Why do they create free open source crypto wallets?  Because they own crypto.  There will be two types of miners.  Those that want to claim coins from scratch (CC's; Coin Claimers), and those that buy coins and mine on the consensus layer to protect their investment (CM's; Consensus Miners).  CM's will be the type of people who like running Full Node's.  CC's will be the competitive type who like creating something from nothing.  CM's will need to be connected to the internet and run a full node and download the blockchain, and CC's will not need internet and will not need to download the blockchain.

Bitcoin designed mining for 2 reasons; fair distribution, and to prevent fraudulent accounting from being accepted.  We already solved the distribution by the claiming coins method.  Preventing fraudulent accounting by mining is already incentivized by people wanting to protect their investment.  I think we have now obsoleted bitcoin's mining fees and mining coin rewards with regards to the consensus layer.

Therefore many decentralized consensus layers can and will be free in every respect.  But I believe some centralized ones will likely charge coin owners for being able to claim coins on their consensus layer.  So in addition to having 1000+ or whatever blocks on your coin, you may also need to contribute a fee to get your coins listed on their consensus layer.  This would be similar to how exchanges work currently.  It is also possible for these consensus layers to charge a fee for trading coins, but I doubt that will be very widespread especially because people are investing into every coin, and coins are not divisible (think of them like satoshi's) so people probably wouldn't want to give them away as fees for every trade.

In conclusion this system would be more decentralized, resistant to 51% attacks, cloneable, flexible and fluid, fungible, high investment and therefore high price, more collaborative, larger more open and embracing community, secure, no fees, offline minable, and coin claiming doesn't require downloading the blockchain.  The downside would be increased complexity, more flexible (less prone to breaking but also more prone to adaptation/change), and value uncertainty.  You don't really know how much resources people are putting into mining coins because they can hide how much they mine until they make their "claim" public.  Even then they may only reveal part of what they have mined, just revealing enough to claim the coin.  But I feel this is a good thing because this uncertainty as to how much more people invested then they let on would raise coin prices.

6.03.2018

Bid Consensus: Offline minable, pool resistant PoW Blockchain

Bid Consensus (BC) is a complex proof of work that leverages everyone orchestrating simultaneous 51% attacks on their own coins in order to secure the network.  The benefits of this proof of work is that it would be minable offline for any set amount of time (a week or more even), it would be minable without a pool and be pool resistant, it would resist network-wide slowdowns of transaction verification, it would resist network-wide 51% attacks, faster sending possibly, and it would be fun and competitive.  Who wouldn't want to orchestrate their very own 51% attack in order to secure the network?

The basis for this idea was invented by Still_Looking on Bitcointalk.org.  He was the scientist who thought up the barebones technology, and I'm the inventor to define it into context so that it can be developed.

The downsides are more complex than current protocols, coins may be possibly less fungible, there could be more uncertainty to who ultimately owns the coins since people can be mining behind the scenes and 51%ing your ownership.

It works something like this.

A coin is developed and a requirement is set as to what are valid coins.  This requirement can be anything but lets say for example the rules are you have to start with a prime number and hash it with a certain algorithm to get the genesis block of your coin(s).  You then have to find a nonce that solves the hash; the nonce when hashed with the previous hash gives a number (new hash) with a certain amount of leading zeroes or whatnot.  And that would be the only starting rules needed.  Now there will be a scramble to find as many prime numbers as possible, hash them with the given algorithm, and then find a nonce; then rehash the previous hash together with the new hash to get the next hash. Find the nonce for that hash and complete the process over and over again.  Each time a nonce is found the chain grows by 1 block.  Thus every "coin" on the network has it's very own blockchain.  This blockchain is relatively simple though, it contains no transactions or signatures at all.

Now what?  Well now there is another layer, a consensus layer which is anything or multiple things but preferably another blockchain or blockchians that should preferably be mined as well.  The coin squatters (people 51%ing their claimed coins) would be incentivized to also mine the consensus layer for free (no fees or coins needed but they can be given as rewards if required) to ensure their investment is secure.  Now if you want to trade your coin how would you do this?  Well first you will have to claim ownership of your coin on the consensus layer.  The way you do this is by making public your individual coins' blockchains.  Now this is where the bidding starts.  Anyone else who is mining that same coin you were will see that you are attempting to claim it.  An arbitrary "auction" time limit is started.  Others who want to claim that coin can then "bid" a higher amount of valid blocks.  After the time limit (or any other limiting factor) is met then the person who posted the highest number of block "bid" wins ownership.  This ownership can be permanent or any amount of time, but preferably something like a week or month or year or sabbatical or jubilee, but lets just refer to it as "jubilee".  Now, after the ownership is awarded in order for this coin to be spent it has to be signed by the winning bidder over to the new owner on the consensus layer.  Now the new owner can spend it in the same way, they now have to sign the transaction to spend it etc.  This is all done on the consensus blockchain which is separate from the individual coin's blockchain which is now on pause.  When the jubilee period is over, bidding opens up afresh and anyone can claim ownership of the coin, and may the holder of the longest blockchain for that coin prevail!  So during the jubilee period it is a sort of hot potato game of sorts, don't be left with the coin when the music stops because then someone else can claim it!  The good thing is everyone will know how much longer the current coin ownership is valid for.

So it is a little more complex than current methods but I feel it holds much promise for a more resilient and less centralizable system.  All the bidding and notifications can be done automatically so you don't have to worry yourself.  Ownership will be continuously refreshed in a fair and predictable way.  There are definitely downsides like coins will be less valuable near the end of the jubilee cycle, but this can always be factored into the mentality, it is no different than inflation.  You can have a single cell phone mining each coin you want to claim if you want and do it offline.  It will be a leaner, meaner, and probably faster than the clunky traditional blockchain implementation that holds tons of data.  So I feel that this protocol will have some real and valuable use cases.


6.02.2018

Proof of Work Squared: new method of human and computer hybrid proof of work POW^2

A new method for securing and enabling the productivity of a blockchain is described wherein useful work and arbitrary work (proof of work, proof of space, proof of space-time, etc.) is used in tandem in order to generate and/or redistribute tokens/coins/etc.  Typically computers hashing generate new coins as well as generate fees for verifying transactions.  The reasons why computer hashing work is desired in order to provide a fair proof for coin generation is because it is hard to fake that work.  Winning a lottery is a good (enough) proof that you bought lots of lottery tickets. You are not going to consistently win lots of lotteries without buying lots of tickets.  There is literally no other way to win the lottery.  This is why hashing algorithms as a proof of work are desired because there is literally no way to win the block without doing tons of computationally and electrically expensive computations.  If, for example, you made the "proof" that you completed many successful transactions; well this can be 'gamed' by creating lots of transactions with yourself.  So you would never loose money because you kept it all yourself, yet you would be generating new coins in addition to what you already had by creating transactions with yourself.  So in order to add new coins fairly to a blockchain or other system you need to really make someone prove they are irreversibly spending their resources to obtain the new coins.  Using "completing successful transactions" would be a successful proof of work however only for redistribution of wealth.  What this means is as long as no new coins are generated in the process, someone wouldn't gain an advantage by doing transactions with themselves.  Just one of their accounts would pay the fee and the other one of their accounts would gain the fee.  So as long as no new coins are generated a fee based redistribution of wealth system works.

However we do want new coins generated.  Why? Because who is to decide the initial distribution of coins?  If a person or group of people decide this then we have a Centralized Digital Currency (CDC).  for a Decentralized Digital Currency (DDC) we want coins to be distributed in a way that is fair to anyone who wants to participate.  Hashing algorithm proof of work is currently the best way to guarantee this fair initial distribution.

Why not proof of stake?  While proof of stake is a good way to prove something, namely that you own coins and are not spending them, this is a terrible way to initially distribute or redistribute coins.  Why? Because it is the opposite of Robin hood, this is taking from the poor to pay the rich (those able to stake large amounts of coins).  So proof of stake can be renamed "Proof of Riches" and "Proof of Hoarding" and that makes no sense and has no place in a decentralized system that is aiming for fairness and where you actually want people to spend and trade the coins not just sit on them.

The reason we would rather not the computers hashing to generate the fees is because then they are double dipping in initial distribution and redistribution.  It would be better if arbitrary work is only used in things that must be proven (initial distribution) and useful work was done for things that cannot be easily gamed (redistribution).   This way real useful work can be incorporated into a blockchain or any other system.

This new method would separate the fee generation from the creation of new coins.  There may be a fixed maximum number of coins or infinite, but preferably infinite.  It could also work where there are fees along with generation of new coins by hashing algorithms (or any other arbitrary proof), and an additional fee for useful work.

A computer using a hashing algorithm will be used to create new coins just like any typical blockchain proof of work currently.  Any hashing algorithm can be used.

A human (or animal or anything including AI) doing useful mental/physical/spiritual or any other type of useful work will be used to generate fees.  This can take any form.  For example a decentralized trading and shipping platform could have nodes set an equation or fixed amount for what they charge to physically ship an item a given distance.  This fee could be subtracted from the coins that were sent in payment for the good(s) between the buyer and seller.

In this way an entity performing a hashing algorithm creates new coins in the network, and an entity performing useful work gains transaction fees in the network.

This can be used for any purpose and/or as part or whole of and/or added as another layer on top of or as a service to any decentralized or centralized system.

This is an open source invention/patent and can be used and plagiarized for any purpose whatsoever.

5.23.2018

A neck salve designed improve neck stiffness, sleep apnea, etc.

Open source patent; neck salve designed to help neck stiffness, sleep apnea, and other symptoms of Mycoplasma infection.

No claims that the invention will cure or treat any disease and instead let people themselves decide what this invention can do for them.  This invention simply is designed to accomplish a goal of killing or inhibiting any type of mycoplasma and/or any other bacteria and/or microorganism such as but not limited to staphylococcus. Whatever health benefits that killing or inactivating of bacteria and/or fungus and/or virus and/or any other microscopic invader and/or commensal would entail are a secondary effect.

Mycoplasma Bovis lives in the neck.  It is called Bovine Tuberculosis.  I believe it is a hidden epidemic causing all sorts of problems for millions if not billions of people across the world.  Stiff neck, tweaking of the neck, sleep apnea, maybe even diabetes and humpback are among the problems I believe that are caused by this bacteria.

This bacteria can be killed by essential oils.  Not just any oils but many have been found to kill this bacteria.  A few of these oils are listed below.  Any, all, and/or more oils can be used.

oreganoRose
Lemongrass
Juniper Berry
Clove
Thyme
Garlic
Nutmeg
Cinnamon
Frankensence
Rosemary
calendula

Carrier oils and thickeners can include but not limited to:

red palm oil
beeswax

A mixture of any type or quantity of any/all/none of the above can be used to make a salve, oil, water soluble lotion or cream or any other type of product that can be applied to the neck and/or surrounding areas like upper back, shoulders, head, or any other part of the body that may be infected by microorganisms.

Also a product targeting toxoplasmosis can also be made.  This would target the lymphnodes in the neck and anywhere else on the body.  Any and all oils that target toxoplasma, protists, plasmodium, ect. can be used.  Some example ingredients are listed below:

german chamomile
thyme
neroli
nutmeg
garlic
ginger
lemongrass
myrtle
rosemary
lantana camara
eucalyptus
sweet wormwood

carrier omega 3 rich like chia seed
beeswax


5.05.2018

How to make Amber


 Amber typically contains up to 8% succinic acid.  We can look at amber a lot like epoxy with 2 parts, a hardener and a polymer.  The hardener in the case of amber is succinic acid and the polymer is communic acid.  I can't find a source of comminic acid but all plant resin seems to contain it.  So to make amber what should work is to add succinic acid to plant resin and heat.  Also adding some bicarbonate source like baking soda may help as well.  Natural plastic or adhesive.

5.04.2018

Why massage helps sore muscles and injuries: It creates more lactic acid!

Icing sore muscles or sprains or other injuries helps but it takes a long time and sometimes doesn't work fully.  But I stumbled on a actual cure that works in literally just a few minutes.  Take braggs vinegar and pour some on a folded up paper towel.  Place this on the injury.  Then cover with an ice bag.  Wait 10 minutes and the pain should be basically gone!  Works best if you also take some baking soda or potassium bicarbonate internally at the same time (creates lactate from the lactic acid).  Sore muscles and injuries hurt because your muscles run out of lactic acid, not that they have too much!  Lactic acid is fuel for your muscles and when your lactic acid runs out you become sore.  What ice does is slow the metabolism of your muscles to give your body a chance to produce more lactic acid and catch up.  Acetic acid from vinegar is very similar and can fill the same role.

Massage likely helps sore muscles because it stimulates the muscles to produce more lactic acid and therefore heal themselves!

I am buying 80% food grade lactic acid from ebay and testing it not only for sore muscles but also to see if it helps me sleep better and prevent sleep apnea.  Lactic acid also appears to increase body temperature along with likely bicarbonate so if you have a low body temp, you may be lactate deficient.  Lactic acid also appears to treat tuberculosis and bovine tuberculosis, of which the bovine variety likely causes sleep apnea since it lives in the neck.  Lactic acid also seems to be a lucrative treatment for hairloss and I am also going to guess chronic fatigue and gynecomastia.

https://www.fatherly.com/news/scientists-discover-cause-cure-hair-loss/

http://blog.lolofit.com/blog/posts/10-surprising-facts-about-lactic-acid

https://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article%20folder/lactate.html

types of organic acuds produced by probiotics.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002364381630398X

5.03.2018

How Jesus Walked on Water and healed people and the foundation of life

Positive charges.  We have realized that gravity is induced electrostatic attraction.  The center of the earth is positively charged.  The earths crust is an insulator.  We are little capacitors attracted to the earth by being relatively negatively charged.  This negative charge can be a handicap in some ways.  This attraction is called "gravity".  This means if you can connect electrically with the center of the earth you can break free of gravity.  The problem is doing this may kill you as it will interfere with the electrical nature of the body.  However a bit of positive charge may help.  If you can find a source of positive charge like hydrothermal vents in water near the surface of the water like in the sea of Galilee, you may be lighter than you would otherwise be.  Hence walking on water.  I believe Jesus took a boat out to these areas and charged his body with it "I have food you know not about".  These positive charges would mimic the effect that eating food has on the body.  Animals near these vents grow much larger than normal.  Also pyramid lake in nevada has similar outlets from the earth and fish grow very large.  Jesus in his boat went to these areas in the sea of Galilee, charged himself up, then went out and touched people to heal them with the charge he had built up in his body.  However this would also feed bacteria, and just like Aaron Traywick, the bacteria and virus gain the biggest advantage from the treatment.

4.26.2018

Plasma engine open source invention atomic fusion BLEVE HHO

The plasma engine open source patent

The plasma engine at it's core is an electric engine as opposed to an electric motor.  The plasma engine uses an electric discharge to create an expansion (such as but not limited to an explosion) of any material.  This material may include, but not limited to, converting a liquid to a gas.  For water a theoretical maximum could be a 1600x volume expansion from a bleve effect, plus possibly more from combustion of the constituent gasses, and even more when considering temperature effects.  Fusion may also occur.  Magnetic unity principles can be used in this device(s) and may help achieve fusion.  Fusion can serve any use, especially to superheat the products to cause more, or in any way improved, expansion.  Components in the device, and/or outside the device and/material may convert and/or store and/or assist in converting or storing fusion energy and any other energy of all types from the device and/or material into work, heat, or any other form of energy.  Magnetic fields and/or pulsed magnetic fields and/or moving or apparently moving magnetic fields (magnetic unity) may also enhance the ability of the material to vaporize, lubricate, dissociate, ionize, fuse, etc.

The electric discharge can be created by any method but preferably a capacitor or capacitor bank connected to high surface area electrodes in the expansion chamber(s).  This capacitor bank may or may not be connected to a means of charging it such as batterie(s) and/or any other method.

This engine can be any design that utilizes expansion chamber(s) with one or multiple stages where material is expanded by electrical discharge. It could even be a converted gas or diesel engine or a new engine or anything else.  The expansion chamber could even be ethereal like water or earth atmosphere or space (photon field) or a magnetic field.  Earths atmosohere could be the expansion chamber of a rocket or jet, water could be the expansion chamber for a water rocket or jet, space in general for any type of craft, and a magnetic field or magnetic unity field could be the expansion chamber for spacecraft.

For a rocket like propulsion, material such as but not limited to water based fuel, can be directed into a plasma ignition chamber where the water is at least vaporized and preferably also separated into hydrogen and oxygen and/or other gasses depending on the fuel and preferably also combusted and/or ionized and preferably also fused into higher elements.  For anything but especially spacecraft, magnetic unity principles can be used to contain the expanding gasses since there is no atmosphere to accomplish this containment in space.  A magnet and/or magnetic unity can also be used in the plasma ignition chamber to aid in anything especially volitalization, electrolysis, ionization, combustion, and/or fusion.

This could also be used for gun-like projectile launching devices.  Some say 6kv .1 microfarad capacitor can create a very explosive shockwave.  Distilled water has a very high dielectric constant and would be great to use to increase capacitance.

At it's simplest this engine could run off of water and electricity, preferably distilled water to prevent corrosion.  Efficiency of this engine may approach or exceed that of an electric motor if only using the BLEVE effect.  But if the water molecules are split releasing hydrogen and oxygen, perhaps much more energy can be liberated by the combustion of these byproducts.  Fusion can release even more energy in a variety of forms, any or all of which may be utilized if desired.

However I feel that the real power of this invention is to create a true fuel-electric hybrid.  And to realize this would be to use something as a fuel that contains more energy than water alone.  This fuel can be anything but preferably a water soluble fuel.  As a water soluble fuel more energy can be added by any method but preferably a carbon based water soluble fuel like graphene or humic/fulvic acid.  Another preferable option could be any emulsified fatty acid such as soap.  Also anything else such as but not limitedlto glycerine, ethanol, methanol, ethylene/propylene glycol, etc.  When the plasma is formed by one of these solutions, not only do the additives reduce the surface tension possibly and help get a fuller expansion effect, but also add energy to the solution that may or may not be released by the plasma in any process such as combustion.  They also may effect the dielctric constant.

Electrolytes may be used to increase conductivity of the solution if desired or any other purpose.

This technology can have any application such as but not limited to: creating rotary motion for any purpose, creating linear motion for any purpose, rockets, cars, planes, boats, watercraft, guns, rockets(underwater or atmospheric), spacecraft, trains, submersibles, robots, any type of transportation, any form of energy generation and/or storage, generating plasma and/or shockwaves for any use, etc.

4.21.2018

How to travel faster than the speed of light by rarefying space

Ah yes the speed limit of the speed of light.

It was just discovered that by slowing down photons sufficiently they stick together.  Researchers say that this can create photon molecules.  What they don't yet realize is that these stuck together photons already exist around us and through us and we cannot sense them since they are not moving!  We can only detect photons when they are moving.  This field of stuck together photons is called Space or the Aether.

Can we disrupt space so that we can break the speed limit of the speed of light?  Easily.  Once you discover the root cause of a problem you are 99% closer to solving it.  Well now that we know what space is exactly we can easily disrupt it.  Photons are suseptible to magnetic fields.  What we can do locally is use high frequency pulsed magnetic fields or principles of Magnetic Unity (see previous posts) to dissolve this molecular matrix of photons and slide through it without having to ride it.  It is like the difference of surfing versus a torpedo.  Surfing you are limited by the water wave propogation speed (analogous to the speed of light) but if you can part the hydrogen bonds of water (analogous to dissolving or rarefying the photon field of space) you can travel through space, not "on top of it" and go much faster than the wave propogation speed.  Just be careful whatever you do that you don't slide into the center of the earth (like what happened in the philadelphia experiment)!  Also you will need protection from the field in the form of a capsule that has alternating layers of superconductor and ferromagnetic material.  A simple iteration of this is copper sheeting and iron sheeting cooled with liquid nitrogen.

4.19.2018

Ambient Atmospheric Triboelectric Generator - Tribogon - open source hardware patent

*Update May 2 3018:  This technology can be used and calibrated to be an electrostatic charging potential of the air (or any medium like water) sensor.  This could be useful anywhere but especially in explosives industry to monitor and/or adjust the risk of explosions from built up charge.  If this sensor charges up in voltage fast it means that the atmosphere is bad at neutralizing charges.  To achieve this monitering it can be done any way but one interesting way is to link it to a small portable computer like an arduino.  The data can be sent and/or stored any way but especially wirelessly to a display device would be ideal.  The data could be presented in any way but especially converted to a new measurement unit such as but not limited to ECP (Electrostatic charging potential).  This unit can be defined as a voltage charging rate of a sensor with defined attributes like material selection, thicknesses, assembly method, surface area, etc.*

Herin is described a method to make a triboelectric generator that generates electricity under ambient atmospheric conditions and also a method to make highly optimized triboelectric generating structures from a single shape panel or many shapes or large pieces as a skin.  This idea was inspired by the way the egyptian pyramids functioned as triboelectric generators and also the natural pyramids that inspired the egyptians to use the shape to electrically pull groundwater to the surface of the earth.  Recently research into triboelectric nanogenerators revealed that pyramids are the optimum shape for triboelectric surfaces.

The Seked.  It is the building block of a modern pyramid.  This shape can be used to tessellate and make the entire surface of a pyramid.  The optimized shape is likely defined as a right triangle whose perpendicular sides are a ratio; 1 and 1.618034. This is roughly the values of the Great Pyramid and is the golden ratio.  This right triangle can be used as panels to create a pyramid structure.  Any shape can be used for this triboelectric generator but the seked may be optimum for many uses.  Left and Right handed versions would be required if a golden seked is used.

This panel should  be able to connect to other panels electrically and perhaps mechanically, but this is not required.  This panel by virtue of its shape can be used to create small pyramids that are a part of the surface of large pyramids, a sort of fractal design if desired.  This can even be used in ambient or high relative motion underwater conditions or in air or elevated above the earth at any altitude even space if desired if certain design considerations like sealing out the elements are taken.

The panel would consist of a layer of thin preferably Teflon PTFE or any other triboelectric material including metals, metaloids, non-metals, semiconductor, mixtures, compounds, molecules, etc or mixtures or combinations therof, in crystalline, amorphous or any other form; preferably .001 thick, but any thickness would work.  What this teflon or any other material layer does is collect charges from the atmosphere or water or anything else.  This layer may or may not contain other materials like carbon to make it conductive or anything else.  This layer may or may not be, but preferably would be, joined tightly to a current collector such as a metal or carbon based sheet.  This joining may include preferably barium titanate and/or carbon of some size mixed with a binder (or no binder) to adhere if desired the teflon with the conductive sheet preferably copper or copper mesh.  If a binder (glue) is used preferably the binder will set while pressure is being applied as to assure a very close contact.  Or if no binder is used a mechanical framing can be used to apply pressure to the contact if desired.  Instead of the conductive sheet a transparent conductor can be used like indium tin oxide.  A transparent current collector would be good if this was used over the top of solar cells.  There would be a dielectric and then another conductive layer.  Binders and other materials may or may not be used between any or all layers.  This is basically a triboelectric energy harvesting capacitor.  The dielectric can be anything but preferably a mixture of barium titanate and epoxy, thinnest layer possible that prevents electrical conduction between the conductive layers.  Multiple of these capacitance layers can be used.  The charge acquired by triboelectricity is temporarily stored in it's inherent capacitance.  So the minimal amount of layers are triboelectric material, current collector (optional but desired), dielectric, current collector; but a baseplate, preferably polycarbonate can also be used for stability and mounting purposes among other uses.  The two conductive layers can be connected to a capacitor and/or battery to "store" acquired charge.  This connection may or may not use diodes.  If diodes are not used then when the capacitor charges to a high enough voltage the panels dielectric may breakdown and short the panel.  Also these panels can be connected to each-other to increase the area of energy harvesting and intrinsic capacitance.  This connection can be made in any way but preferably would include a resistor on the order of 100 ohm to 1 Mega-ohm so that dangerous large sparks cannot be produced from discharge.  The larger the resistance used the better the intrinsic capacitor needs to be so that it can acquire a high charge without dissipating.  The connection between panels can be made with wire and connectors or even mechanically by conductive surfaces as the panels are placed together or near each-other.  Alternatively they could be connected by way of a shared "baseplate" that multiple panels are placed on or connected to.

The teflon surface itself or the assembly in general can be flat or even include small shapes such as pyramids (circular pyramids or any number of straight sides like square pyramids) stamped into the plastic or panel or made any other way.  Micro/nano pyramids can also be created on the surface of the PTFE teflon by corona discharge treating the surface preferably with a wattage of over 100W in order to make the surface superhydrophobic.  This creates micro pyramid like structures on the surface and will greatly enhance the triboelectric generating potential. For joining the seams between panels and perhaps even the edges of the individual panels themselves a surface protection teflon tape can be used if desired.

This technology can be used for any use, from panels for houses to building scale pyramid models, to energy harvesting groups of structures, to smooth skins for cars, planes, and boats.  It can be used in high, medium, or low atmospheric agitation. Any application of this technology is possible and covered under this open source invention.

Example purchase list and calculations:

185.8312 m height of piece 7316.189 in 11.001 (1:665 scale) <<11">>
115.1833 m leg of piece 4534.776 in 6.819 (1:665 scale) <<6.8">>
1.618034 golden ratio

.002 thick teflon
https://www.mcmaster.com/#8569k34/=1ciha7i

Polycarbonate
https://www.mcmaster.com/#8574k192/=1cil0wr

1/2" teflon tape
https://www.mcmaster.com/#6305a21/=1ciglt8

Steel for press
https://www.mcmaster.com/#1607t153/=1cilmou

rubber for pressing on teflon
https://www.mcmaster.com/#1370n39/=1cilpr6

1 mil copper
https://basiccopper.com/12x101milcof.html

Screen printing frame
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Silk-screen-printing-frames-16-x12-inside-14-x10-with-Premium-180-Mesh/222827618638?hash=item33e18fa14e:g:DZ4AAOSwRbtZ8Tzz

Silk screen material
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-yard-Silk-screen-printing-mesh-fabric-60M-24T-width-50inch-white-screen-mesh/261982975260?hash=item3cff66f51c:g:SyIAAOSwPcVVtvDM

tetra-etch
http://store.armyproperty.com/products/etching-solution-nsn-6850-00-431-8662.html

epoxy for PTFE
http://www.glueonline.co.uk/acatalog/Structural_Adhesives.html

Barium Titanate
https://micronmetals.com/product/electronic-grade/

Barium Carbonate
https://www.ebay.com/itm/BARIUM-CARBONATE-99-1-Pound-lb-Lab-Ceramic-Chemical-BaCO3/201990146353?hash=item2f078d0931:g:c9MAAOxy1VlREXDl

4.14.2018

Trump needs to be impeached for launching Syrian War

Wow.  I can't say I'm surprised but I am shocked by what Trump just did.  I thought he was backing off his rhetoric with the "I never said when we would strike!" thing.  But apparently my hope was in vain.  There exists NO EVIDENCE that Assad launched the chemical weapons!  The last time we sent missiles against Syria for using "sarin gas" there still exists to this day NO EVIDENCE that Assad or the Syrian government at all launched the attack!  This was just  announced by Mattis on Feb 2nd!  

If Trump and may and Macron have some "secret evidence" (worked great with "weapons of mass destruction" and "sarin gas attacks" right??) They better f'ing make that evidence public before launching an attack.  That is the LEAST they could do.  In reality the constitution DICTATES that the president CAN ONLY DIRECT THE MILITARY AFTER CONGRESS DECLARES WAR!!! Article I section 8 clause 11.  ANY PRESIDENT THAT LAUNCHES A "MILITARY STRIKE" without congressional approval MUST BE IMPEACHED.  End of story.  Russia would be fully justified to sink any ship that is proved to have launched missiles at bases in Syria.  I hope they don't make the same mistake as Trump and wait until there is public proof as to the identity of the ships that launched the attack.  I wouldn't want to be in the military or large strategic population centers in America right about now as Russia sinking our warships will certainly trigger a WORLD WAR.  Make no mistake, Russia isn't going to turn a blind eye even if no Russians were killed, the way the west has treated Russia has brought Russia to the absolute edge and like a cornered cat they will fight with everything and I mean everything they have even if there is no chance they can win.  You push someone to the edge unjustly like the west has pushed Russia and they will not only risk but sacrifice their lives and the very existence of their country to fight back in TOTAL WAR.